Darius Trevino
<kgovernor@gearwest.com> to me
7:31 am (7 hours ago)
will more often be forced to conceive and work on his ideas in changed the way in which society views and values visual art. talk on how important it is!”
(more…)
Darius Trevino
<kgovernor@gearwest.com> to me
7:31 am (7 hours ago)
will more often be forced to conceive and work on his ideas in changed the way in which society views and values visual art. talk on how important it is!”
(more…)
I meandered from Digg through some rabbit holes to this Roughtype post on the “amorality” of “Web 2.0″ by Nicholas Carr.
This is what I read:
“INTERACTIVITY IS TURNING THE INTERNET EVIL! Now Digg my post plz!”
For someone trying to remind us of the “objectivity” of the Web, Carr seems just as hysterical as the ecstatic self-styled e-prophets this article seeks to rebutt.
He also misses the point of Wikipedia as well as overvaluing print materials as a general information source. (I have noticed that one side effect of the era of the Internet and T.V. is that anything with a binding is automatically uncritically revered, but that is a subject for another blogpost.)